Mangal Pandey: The Rising

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from The Rising (Indian movie))
Jump to: navigation, search
Mangal Pandey:
The Rising
Image:Mangal Pandey movie poster.jpg
Directed by Ketan Mehta
Produced by Bobby Bedi
Written by Farrukh Dhondy
Starring Aamir Khan
Rani Mukerji
Toby Stephens
Amisha Patel
Kirron Kher
Distributed by Yash Raj Films
Release date(s) August 12 2005
Running time 150 min.
Language Hindi
English
Budget Rs. 330M (estimated)
IMDb profile

Mangal Pandey: The Rising (Indian title) or The Ballad of Mangal Pandey (international title) (released in India on August 12, 2005) is an Indian movie based on the life of Mangal Pandey who is known for his role as a leader in the Indian rebellion of 1857 which led to the downfall of the British East India Company. It is directed by Ketan Mehta, produced by Bobby Bedi, and with a screenplay by Farrukh Dhondy.

Aamir Khan, a leading Bollywood actor, plays the lead role of Mangal Pandey. Mangal Pandey was a Sepoy who helped spark the Indian rebellion of 1857. Subsequently the mutiny was called "The Sepoy Mutiny" or "The Sepoy Rebellion" by most of the English-speaking world, while Indians referred to it as the "First War of Independence".

Contents

[edit] Synopsis

Image:Main-vari-vari.jpg
Rani Mukerji as 'Heera' in the song "Main Vari Vari"

The film begins in 1857, when India was ruled by the British East India Company. Mangal Pandey (portrayed by Bollywood superstar Aamir Khan) is a soldier (Sepoy) for the East India company who is fighting in the Anglo-Afghan Wars and who saves the life of his British commanding officer, William Gordon (portrayed by Toby Stephens). Gordon is indebted to Mangal and a strong friendship develops between them, transcending both rank and race.

The friendship, however, is soon challenged by a number of factors. One is the arrival of a charming and beautiful young aristocrat, Emily Kent (portrayed by Coral Beed). Later, after Gordon rescues the young widow, Jwala (portrayed by Amisha Patel) from committing Sati (the act of following her deceased husband into the funeral pyre), he falls in love with her. In addition, Heera (portrayed by Rani Mukerji) has been sold into prostitution, to work for Lol Bibi (portrayed by Kiron Kher). She soon catches the eyes of Mangal Pandey and a liaison follows.

The most significant factor, however, is the introduction of a new rifle, the Enfield Rifled Musket. Rumors began to spread among the Sepoys that the cartridges (referring here to cardboard wrapped powder and shot, not metallic cartridges) were greased with either pig fat or beef tallow- an abhorrent concept to Muslim and Hindu soldiers, respectively, for religious reasons. British military drills of the time required soldiers to bite open the cartridge, pour the gunpowder contained within down the barrel, then ram the cartridge paper down the barrel to act as a wad, before finally ramming a musketball down the barrel, removing the ram-rod, shouldering the rifle, adding a percussion cap, and firing. The idea of having anything which might be tainted with pig or beef fat in their mouths was unacceptable to the Sepoys. When they objected, it was suggested that they were more than welcome to make up their own batches of cartridges, using a religiously acceptable greasing agent such as beeswax or vegetable oil. This served to the Sepoys as "proof" that the issued cartridges were, in fact, greased with pig and/or beef fat, and a further suggestion that the sepoys tear the cartridges open with their hands (instead of biting them open) was also rejected as being impractical- many of the sepoys had been undertaking musket drill daily for years, and the practice of biting the cartridge open was second nature to them.

Gordon assures Mangal that the cartridges are free from pollution and demonstrating his total trust in Gordon, Mangal bites the cartridge. The soldiers soon discover that the cartridges really are greased by animal fat and the rumour of this imposed pollution is the spark that ignites the powder keg of resentment in the country. Mutiny breaks out, led by Mangal.

The film ends with documentary footage of Mahatma Gandhi.

[edit] Box Office

The film had a successful start at the box office [1] in its opening week and became an overall average grosser.[2].

[edit] Cast

[edit] Criticism

The Bhartiya Janata Party demanded a ban on the film, accusing it of showing "falsehood" and indulging in "character assassination" of Mangal Pandey. As an example, the BJP spokesman stated that the film shows Mangal Pandey visiting the house of a prostitute, which was nothing but character assassination.[1] The Samajwadi Party leader Uday Pratap Singh also made a demand to ban the movie in Rajya Sabha over "innaccurate portrayal" of Mangal Pandey in the film.[2] The Uttar Pradesh government also criticized the film for "distortion" of historical facts, and considered a ban on it.[3] The protestors in Mangal Pandey's native district Ballia damaged a shop selling cassettes and CDs of the film, stalled a goods train on its way to Chapra (Bihar), and staged a sit-in on the Ballia-Barriya highway.[3]

The film was also criticised by for historical revisionism. The New York Post editorial writer Jonathan Foreman criticised the movie for "casual rewriting of history", "historical reconstruction", resusicating the "old lie" about the cartridges as historical truth, and ignoring the massacres of British and Eurasian people by the mutineers.[4] He also pointed out that the movie showed British officers buying Indian slave girls, while in fact, the British rulers had banned slavery in India. Similarly the movie showed the British destroying Indian villages for the East India Company's opium profits, while in reality, the profits made in Indian by the Company were due to the tea cultivation, not opium cultivation. Foreman said that the film's "distortions" are "almost comical" at times. For example, Mangal Pandey is shown killing several British officers and leading an armed rebellion, which never happened. The only incident that involved Mangal Pandey was his shooting at the senior officers on March 29, 1857. Forman wrote:[4]

Nationalist myths are blatantly presented as historical truth, grotesquely misrepresenting the way the East India Company ruled India and the real causes of the Indian Mutiny...

It's a twisting of history akin to depicting a French victory at Trafalgar... And that's just one of the grotesque distortions in this crudely nationalistic epic, crammed with anachronisms - and, incidentally, the most expensive movie ever made in India...

The truth is very different, and it is sad that even as India rises to become a modern world power, its filmmakers remain stuck in a post- colonial time warp, depicting their country's fascinating past in such a crude, dishonest and simplistic way.

Jonathan Foreman, New York Post

[edit] References

[edit] External links

de:The Rising – Aufstand der Helden
Views
Personal tools

Toolbox