Moons of Pluto

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Pluto's natural satellites)
Jump to: navigation, search
Image:Pluto system 2006.jpg
Hubble image of the Plutonian system

Pluto has three known moons. The largest, Charon, is proportionally larger, compared to its primary, than any other satellite of a known planet or dwarf planet in the solar system. The other two moons, Nix and Hydra, are much smaller.[1]

Contents

[edit] Pluto's satellite system

Image:Pluto system.svg
The orbits of the Plutonian system as seen from Earth, calculated from the discovery images of the outer moons.
Image:TheKuiperBelt Orbits PlutoQuadSystem.svg
The orbits of the Plutonian system as seen from the pole of Charon's orbit.

The innermost moon, Charon, was discovered by James Christy on 1978 June 22, nearly half a century after Pluto. Two outer moons were imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope Pluto Companion Search Team on 2005 May 15, and precovered from Hubble images taken in June 2002. With the orbits confirmed, the moons have been given definitive names: Hydra (Pluto III, formerly S/2005 P 1) and Nix (Pluto II, formerly S/2005 P 2). The names were chosen in part because the initials (NH) allude to the New Horizons mission [1]. Further Hubble observations were made in February and March 2006. Given the sensitivity of the Hubble images, and the fact that the entire region of space dominated by Pluto's gravitational field has been imaged, Pluto is not expected to have any other moons larger than approximately 12 km in diameter with the albedo of Charon, or possibly up to 40 km if they are as dark as the darkest Kuiper Belt objects. The possibility of rings created by impacts on the smaller moons will be investigated by the New Horizons probe.

The Plutonian system is highly compact: The three known satellites orbit within the inner 3% of the region where prograde orbits would be stable.

Pluto and Charon have been called a double planet because Charon is larger compared to Pluto (half its diameter and an eighth its mass) than any other moon is to a planet; indeed Charon is massive enough that, despite their proximity, Pluto orbits the system's barycenter at a point outside its surface.[2] Charon and Pluto are also tidally locked, so that they always present the same face toward each other.

Following Buie and Grundy's recent re-calculations taking into account older images, the orbits of the moons are confirmed to be circular and coplanar, with inclinations differing less than 0.4° and eccentricities less than 0.005. The inclinations are roughly 96° to the ecliptic (so technically the moons' movements are retrograde). The diagram on the right shows the view from the axis of the moons' orbits (declination 0°, right ascension 133°), aligned with the HST diagram above it. As seen from Earth, these circular orbits appear foreshortened into ellipses depending on Pluto's position.[3]

The Plutonian system has not been visited by spacecraft, but a flyby by the New Horizons mission is due in July 2015.

[edit] Table of known moons

The Plutonian moons are listed here by orbital period, from shortest to longest. Moons massive enough for their surfaces to have collapsed into a spheroid are highlighted in light purple. Pluto has been added for comparison, for it orbits a point outside itself.

Notes:
Data from Buie & Grundy
Name
(pronunciation)
Image Mean diameter (km) Mass (×1021 kg) Semi-major
axis (km)
Orbital period (days) Eccentricity Inclination
(to Pluto's equator)
Discovery date
Pluto 2306 ± 20 13.05 ± 0.07 2390 6.387230 0 1930
Pluto I Charon /ˈʃɛərən/,[4] /ˈkɛərən/ 1207 ± 3 1.52 ± 0.06 19 571 ± 4 6.387230 0 (0.000% ± 0.007%) 0.00° ± 0.014° 1978
Pluto II Nix /ˈnɪks/ 46-137 < 0.002 48 675 ± 120 24.856 ± 0.001 ~0 (0.2% ± 0.2%) 0.04° ± 0.22° 2005
Pluto III Hydra /ˈhaɪdrə/ 61-167 < 0.002 64 780 ± 90 38.206 ± 0.001 0.5% ± 0.1% 0.22° ± 0.12° 2005
Image:Plutonian system size.svg
Relative sizes and colors of the Plutonian system.

When discovered, Hydra was somewhat brighter than Nix, and therefore thought to be larger by 20%, but follow-up observations found them to be nearly identical. It is likely that the change in brightness is due to the lightcurve of Hydra, but whether this is due to an irregular shape or to a variation in surface brightness (albedo) is unknown. The diameters of objects can be estimated from their assumed albedos; the estimates above correspond to a 35% albedo like Charon, but the moons could be as large as 130 km if they have the 4% albedo of the darkest KBOs. However, given their color and suspected chemical similarities to Charon, it is likely that their albedos are similar as well and that the diameters are closer to the lower estimates.

[edit] Resonances and the origin of the Plutonian system

It is suspected that the Plutonian satellite system was created by a massive collision, similar to the "Big Whack" believed to have created the Earth's moon. In both cases it may be that the high angular momenta of the moons can only be explained by such a scenario. The nearly circular orbits of the smaller moons suggests that they were also formed in this collision, rather than being captured Kuiper Belt objects. This and their near orbital resonances with Charon (see below) suggest that they formed even closer to Pluto than they are at present, and that they migrated outward as Charon achieved its current orbit. If Hydra and Nix turn out to be tidally locked, as Charon is, that will settle the issue, as tidal forces are insufficient to damp their rotations in their present orbits. Both are a Lunar grey like Charon,[5] which is consistent with a common origin. Their difference in color from Pluto, one of the reddest bodies in the Solar system due to the effects of sunlight on the nitrogen and methane ices of its surface, may be due to a loss of such volatiles during the impact or subsequent coalescence, leaving the surfaces of the moons dominated by water ice. Such an impact would be expected to create additional debris (more moons), but these must be relatively small to have avoided detection by Hubble. It is possible that there are also undiscovered irregular satellites, which are captured Kuiper Belt objects.

Nix and Hydra are very close to a 1:4:6 orbital resonance with the Charon-Pluto orbital period: Nix is within 2.7% of resonance, while Hydra is within 0.3%, though neither are in an exact resonance. It may be that these orbits originated as forced resonances when Charon was tidally boosted into its current geosynchronous orbit, and then released from resonance as Charon's orbital eccentricity was tidally damped. Today the Pluto-Charon pair continue to produce strong tidal forces, with the gravitational field at the outer moons varying by 15% peak to peak. At the lower estimated size range, Nix should have no significant precession, while Hydra should have a precession period of 15 years. However, at their maximum projected masses (assuming an albedo of 4%), the two moons may be in a 3:2 orbital resonance with each other, with libration periods of 400 to 450 days, though this may already be ruled out by the low eccentricity of Charon.[6] Thus accurate orbital data can help resolve the sizes of these moons.

However, it was recently calculated that a resonance with Charon could boost either Nix or Hydra into its current orbit, but not both: boosting Hydra would have required a near-zero Charonian eccentricity of 0.024, while boosting Nix would have required a larger eccentricity of at least 0.05. They suggest instead that Nix and Hydra were captured and migrated inward until they were trapped in resonance with Charon [7].

Image:PLUTOMOONFROM4.jpg
Creation of Pluto's Moons. Number 1 shows a Kuiper Belt Object nearing Pluto. Number 2 shows a KBO is impacting Pluto. Number 3 shows a dust ring forming around Pluto. Number 4 shows the Debris clumping together to form Charon. Number 5 shows Pluto and Charon becoming a spherical body and Charon orbiting Pluto

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Schilling, Govert. "Pluto's Twins Get Their Names", ScienceNOW Daily News, 20 June 2006. Retrieved on 2006-06-21. 
  2. ^ See P1P2_motion.avi (AVI). and barycenter for animations
  3. ^ Orbits of 4 Bodies in Pluto System about Barycenter as Seen from Earth. Hubblesite. Retrieved on 2006-06-21.
  4. ^ Many astronomers use this idiosyncratic pronunciation, rather than the classical IPA: /ˈkɛərən/, but both are acceptable.
  5. ^ Hubble's Latest Look at Pluto's Moons Supports a Common Birth. Hubblesite. Retrieved on 2006-06-21.
  6. ^ Lee, Man Hoi; S. J. Peale (May 9 2006). On the Orbits and Masses of the Satellites of the Pluto-Charon System (PDF). arXiv.org. Retrieved on 2006-06-21.
  7. ^ Y. Lithwick & Y. Wu (2007). "On the Origin of Pluto's Minor Moons, Nix and Hydra". American Astronomical Society, DDA meeting #38, #3.05.

[edit] References

  • S.A. Stern, H.A. Weaver, A.J. Steffl, M.J. Mutchler, W.J. Merline, M.W. Buie, E.F. Young, L.A. Young, & J.R. Spencer (2006), Characteristics and Origin of the Quadruple System at Pluto, Nature, submitted (preprint)
  • Steffl A.J., Mutchler M.J., Weaver H.A., Stern S.A., Durda D.D., Terrell D., Merline W.J., Young L.A., Young E.F., Buie M.W., Spencer J.R. (2005), New Constraints on Additional Satellites of the Pluto System, Astronomical Journal, submitted (preprint)
  • Buie M.W., Grundy W.M., Young, E.F., Young L.A., Stern S.A. (2005), Orbits and photometry of Pluto's satellites: Charon, S/2005 P1 and S/2005 P2, submitted (preprint)
  • IAU Circular No. 8625 describing the discovery
  • IAU Circular No. 8686 which reports a much more neutral color for P2
  • IAU Circular No. 8723 announcing the names of Nix and Hydra
  • Background Information Regarding Our Two Newly Discovered Satellites of Pluto – The discoverers' website

[edit] External links


 v  d  e The Solar System
<imagemap>

Image:Solar System XXVII.png

  1. The Sun

circle 0 0 90 35 The Sun

  1. Mercury

circle 112 18 6 Mercury

  1. Venus

circle 153 18 8 Venus

  1. Earth and the Moon

circle 203 8 4 The Moon circle 194 18 8 Earth

  1. Mars and satellites

circle 239 13 3 Phobos and Deimos circle 233 18 8 Mars

  1. Ceres and the asteroid belt
  2. - by placing the rectangle code for the asteroid belt AFTER Ceres, Ceres is "on top" (and can co-exist)

circle 271 18 8 Ceres rect 256 0 288 35 The asteroid belt

  1. Jupiter and satellites

circle 316 18 15 Jupiter circle 329 5 6 Moons of Jupiter

  1. Saturn and satellites

circle 372 18 10 Saturn circle 381 7 6 Moons of Saturn

  1. Uranus and satellites

circle 418 18 9 Uranus circle 427 10 6 Moons of Uranus

  1. Neptune and satellites

circle 471 10 3 Moons of Neptune circle 462 18 12 Neptune

  1. Pluto, satellites, and the Kuiper belt
  2. - by placing the rectangle code for the Kuiper belt AFTER Pluto, Pluto is "on top" (and can co-exist)

circle 508 13 3 Moons of Pluto circle 504 18 8 Pluto rect 492 0 527 35 The Kuiper Belt

  1. Eris, Dysnomia, and the Scattered disc
  2. - by placing the rectangle code for the Scattered disc AFTER Eris, Eris is "on top" (and can co-exist)

circle 544 14 3 Dysnomia circle 540 18 8 Eris rect 528 0 567 35 The Scattered Disc rect 568 0 597 35 The Oort Cloud

desc none

  1. - setting this to "bottom-right" will display a (rather large) icon linking to the graphic, if desired
  1. Notes:
  2. Details on the new coding for clickable images is here: [2]
  3. The smaller planets have a bit of an overlap just to ensure they're locatable, especially in the belts.
  4. While it may look strange, it's important to keep the codes for a particular system in order. The clickable coding treats the first object created in an area as the one on top.
  5. - I've placed moons on "top" so that their smaller circles won't disappear "under" their respective planets or dwarf planets.
  6. The "poly" code would be more appropriate for the moons of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus. However, there appears to be a bug with that aspect of the code.
  7. - I've compensated by using oversized circles for those moon groups, and tucking them UNDER their planets for now.
  8. The Sun is a rectangle as that approximates the edge closely enough for the purposes of this template.
  9. I've guessed as to the boundaries for the KB, SD, and OC - if they need adjustment, load the image into Paint and use the pencil tool to find the appropriate coordinates.

</imagemap>

The Sun · Mercury · Venus · Earth · Mars · Ceres · Jupiter · Saturn · Uranus · Neptune · Pluto · Eris
Planets · Dwarf planets · Moons: Terrestrial · Martian · Jovian · Saturnian · Uranian · Neptunian · Plutonian · Eridian
Small bodies:   Meteoroids · Asteroids/Asteroid moons (Asteroid belt) · Centaurs · TNOs (Kuiper belt/Scattered disc) · Comets (Oort cloud)
See also astronomical objects, the solar system's list of objects, sorted by radius or mass, and the Solar System Portal
be-x-old:Спадарожнікі Плютона

cs:Měsíce Pluta es:Lunas de Plutón fr:Système plutonien io:Sateliti di Plutono it:Satelliti naturali di Plutone lt:Plutono palydovai ja:冥王星の衛星 pl:Księżyce Plutona ru:Спутники Плутона sk:Mesiace Pluta sv:Plutos naturliga satelliter tl:Mga buwan ng Pluto

Views
Personal tools

Toolbox