Genealogy of scripts derived from Proto-Sinaitic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Image:Language travel from India.png
Spread of Indic branch of Proto-Sinaitic writing systems from India to Eastern Asia. Note that 'Nepali' on the map is not the Nepali language or its script; also the spread of Siddham is not associated with the evolution of Chinese or Japanese writing systems.

Nearly all the segmental scripts (loosely "alphabets", but see below for more precise terminology) used around the globe appear to have derived from the Proto-Sinaitic alphabet.[citation needed] These include the Latin alphabet — forms of which are used today to write numerous languages — but also such disparate cousins as the writing systems of Hebrew, Arabic, both runes, Ethiopic, Devanagari writing of India, the native scripts of the Philippines and Indonesia, and perhaps Cree "Syllabics" and, to a limited degree, Korean Hangul. There are also syllabic systems derived superficially from these alphabets, such as Cherokee and the Japanese Sign Language syllabary.

Only a few alphabets are not graphically derived from this family of scripts. These include N'Ko (Bambara), Ol Chiki (Santali), Zhuyin (Chinese phonics), Tāna (Maldivian), Braille, and the now extinct Ogham (Old Irish), Meroitic (Kush), and semi-alphabetic Old Persian cuneiform scripts.

The first Middle Bronze Age alphabets were adapted from Egyptian hieroglyphs. A possibly independent alphabet, Meroitic, was also adapted from Egyptian hieroglyphs, and therefore may be a cousin to the Proto-Sinaitic family.

[edit] Genealogy

[edit] Notes

  • The dates are intended to show the approximate 'birthdate' of a script; however in many cases (marked by 'c.') they are widely approximate, and may be off even by centuries. In several cases, the development of one script into another was a gradual process over several centuries, that is difficult to pin down with precision. Following that, in parentheses, is the name of one or two modern countries corresponding to the region where the script was first widely used. In a few cases, a direct graphic letter-to-letter correspondence cannot be precisely established between a 'parent script' and its children, making the exact placement of some family members somewhat controversial, eg. in the case of the Tibetan or Georgian alphabets. Much of the information here was compiled from the "Ancient Scripts" and "Omniglot" websites, which do not always agree. Despite many of these scripts commonly being called "alphabets", the recent linguistic classifications of abugidas and semi-syllabaries are shown in Italic; the others are abjads or alphabets proper. Many of these scripts are no longer widely used for writing any language today, having been abandoned in favor of others; those that still are, have been marked with '*', and additionally are written in bold.
  • Some scholars, including Gari Ledyard, believe that the core consonants of Hangul were taken from the earlier Phagspa script, with the other consonants derived from these. See Gari Ledyard for more complete information.

[edit] See also

ar:سلسلة نسب الكتابات المشتقة من الأبجدية السينائية القديمة ca:Genealogia dels sistemes d'escriptura derivats del protosinaític fr:Généalogie des écritures dérivées du protosinaïtique hu:Ábécék származás szerinti listája ja:原シナイ文字から派生した文字体系 zh:原始迦南文系譜

Retrieved from "http://india.smashits.com/wikipedia/Genealogy_of_scripts_derived_from_Proto-Sinaitic"
Views
Personal tools

Toolbox