Discourse analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Text document with red question mark.svg

This article or section includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks in-text citations.
You can improve this article by introducing more precise citations.

Discourse analysis (DA), or discourse studies, is a general term for a number of approaches to analyzing written, spoken or signed language use.

The objects of discourse analysis—discourse, writing, talk, conversation, communicative event, etc.—are variously defined in terms of coherent sequences of sentences, propositions, speech acts or turns-at-talk. Contrary to much of traditional linguistics, discourse analysts not only study language use 'beyond the sentence boundary', but also prefer to analyze 'naturally occurring' language use, and not invented examples.

Discourse analysis has been taken up in a variety of social science disciplines, including linguistics, anthropology, sociology, cognitive psychology, social psychology, international relations and communication studies, each of which is subject to its own assumptions, dimensions of analysis, and methodologies.

1 History
2 Topics of interest
3 Perspectives
4 Some prominent analysts
5 References
6 See also

[edit] History

The term discourse analysis first entered general use as the title of a paper published by Zellig Harris in 1952, although that paper did not yet offer a systematic analysis of linguistic structures 'beyond the sentence level'.

As a new cross-discipline, DA began to develop in the late 1960s and 1970s in most of the humanities and social sciences, more or less at the same time, and in relation with, other new (inter- or sub-) disciplines, such as semiotics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, and pragmatics.

Whereas earlier studies of discourse, for instance in text linguistics, often focused on the abstract structures of (written) texts, many contemporary approaches, especially those influenced by the social sciences, favor a more dynamic study of (spoken, oral) talk-in-interaction.

[edit] Topics of interest

Topics of interest to discourse analysts include:

The various levels or dimensions of discourse, such as sounds (intonation, etc.), gestures, syntax, the lexicon, style, rhetoric, meanings, speech acts, moves, strategies, turns and other aspects of interaction
Genres of discourse (various types of discourse in politics, the media, education, science, business, etc.)
The relations between discourse and the emergence of sentence syntax
The relations between text (discourse) and context
The relations between discourse and power
The relations between discourse and interaction
The relations between discourse and cognition and memory

[edit] Perspectives

The following are some of the specific theoretical perspectives and analytical approaches used in linguistic discourse analysis:

Text grammar (or 'discourse grammar')
Functional grammar
Rhetoric
Stylistics (linguistics)
Interactional sociolinguistics
Ethnography of communication
Pragmatics, particularly speech act theory
Conversation analysis
Variation analysis
Applied linguistics
Cognitive psychology, often under the label discourse processing, studying the production and comprehension of discourse.
Discursive psychology
Critical discourse analysis

Although these approaches emphasizes different aspects of language use, they all view language as social interaction, and are concerned with the social contexts in which discourse is embedded.

Often a distinction is made between 'local' structures of discourse (such as relations between sentences, propositions or turns), and 'global' structures, such as the overall topics and the schematic organization of the discourse or conversation as a whole. For instance many discourse types begin with some kind of 'summary', for instance in titles, headlines, leads, abstracts, and so on.

[edit] Some prominent analysts

Robert de Beaugrande, Jan Blommaert, Adriana Bolivar, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, Wallace Chafe, Paul Chilton, Guy Cook, Malcolm Coulthard, Paul Drew, Alessandro Duranti, Brenton D. Faber, Norman Fairclough, Talmy Givón, Charles Goodwin, Art Graesser, Michael Halliday, John Heritage, Janet Holmes, Paul Hopper, Gail Jefferson, Barbara Johnstone, Walter Kintsch, Adam Jaworski, William Labov, George Lakoff, Stephen H. Levinsohn, Robert E. Longacre, Jim Martin, Elinor Ochs, Jonathan Potter, Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Deborah Schiffrin, Michael Schober, Stef Slembrouck, John Swales, Deborah Tannen, Sandra Thompson, Teun A. van Dijk, Theo van Leeuwen, Jef Verschueren, Henry Widdowson, Carla Willig, Ruth Wodak, Michel Foucault,Margaret Wetherell, Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe among many others.

[edit] References

Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, G., and George Yule (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. (1997). Investigating English Discourse. London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2005). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.
Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds). (1999). The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.
Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Longacre, R.E. (1996). The grammar of discourse. New York: Plenum Press.
Renkema, J. (2004). Introduction to discourse studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Schiffrin, D., Deborah Tannen, & Hamilton, H. E. (eds.). (2001). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell
Teun A. van Dijk, (ed). (1997). Discourse Studies. 2 vols. London: Sage.