Comfort women

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Emblem-important.svg

The neutrality and factual accuracy of this article are disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.

Image:Broom icon.svg

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can. (November 2007)

Comfort women
Japanese name
Kanji 慰安婦 Rōmaji ianfu
Alternate Japanese name
Kanji 従軍慰安婦 Rōmaji jūgun-ianfu
Chinese name
Traditional Chinese 慰安婦 Simplified Chinese 慰安妇 Hanyu Pinyin Wèiān Fù Wade-Giles Wei-An Fu
Korean name
Hangul 위안부 Hanja 慰安婦 Revised Romanization wianbu McCune-Reischauer wianbu

Comfort women (慰安婦, ianfu^?) or military comfort women (従軍慰安婦, jūgun-ianfu^?) is a euphemism for the women who were forced into prostitution and sexual slavery for Japanese military brothels during World War II.^[1] Around 10,000 - 200,000 are estimated to have been procured, but there is still some disagreement about exactly how many women were. However, historians and researchers have stated that the majority were from Korea, China, but women from the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, the Dutch East Indies, Indonesia, and other Japanese-occupied territories were also involved in "comfort stations". These stations were located in Japan, China, the Philippines, Indonesia, the then Malaya, Thailand, the then Burma, the then New Guinea, Hong Kong, Macau, and the then French Indochina.[3][4] Young women from countries under Japanese imperial domination were reportedly abducted from their homes against their will, while in some cases women were also recruited with offers of work in military canteens and factories and subsequently forced to sexual service.^[2][3][4] It has been documented that the Japanese military itself recruited women by force.^[5]

The size and nature of sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II is still being debated, especially in Japan. Many military brothels were run by private agents and supervised by the Japanese Army. Some Japanese historians, using the testimony of ex-comfort women, have argued that the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy were either directly or indirectly involved in coercing, deceiving, luring, and sometimes kidnapping young women throughout Japan's Asian colonies and occupied territories.^[6]

Contents 1 Number of comfort women 2 Country of origin 3 Establishment of the Comfort Women System 3.1 Japanese military prostitution 3.2 Recruitment 3.3 Treatment of comfort women 3.4 Evidence 4 History of the controversy 4.1 Disputed testimony of an ex-soldier 4.2 Initial government response and litigation 4.3 Kono statement 4.4 Asia Women's Fund 4.5 United Nations Human Rights Commission 4.5.1 Guilt and liability 4.5.2 Official position of the Japanese government 4.6 Abe controversy 4.7 U.S. Congressional resolution 4.8 Dutch Parliament resolution 4.9 Canadian Lower House resolution 4.10 European Parliament resolution 5 Counter theories 6 See also 7 References 7.1 Footnotes 7.2 Print media 7.3 Web 7.4 Academic research 7.5 Japanese official statements 7.6 United States historical documents

[edit] Number of comfort women

Lack of official documentation has made estimations of total numbers of comfort women difficult, as vast amounts of material pertaining to matters related to war crimes and the war responsibility of the nation's highest leaders were deleted on the orders of the Japanese government.^[7] Historians have arrived at various estimates by looking at surviving documentation which indicate the ratio of the number of soldiers in a particular area to the number of women, as well as looking at replacement rates of the women.^[8] Historian Yoshiaki Yoshimi, who conducted the first academic study on the topic which brought the issue out into the open, estimated the number to be between 50,000 and 200,000.^[9]

Based on these estimates, most international media sources quote about 200,000 young women were recruited to serve in Japanese military brothels. The BBC quotes "200,000 to 300,000" and the International Commission of Jurists quotes "estimates of historians of 100,000 to 200,000 women."^[10]

[edit] Country of origin

Internationally, it is generally quoted that most of them were from Korea and China.^[11][12] Others came from the Philippines, Taiwan, Dutch East Indies, and other Japanese-occupied countries and regions.^[13] Some Dutch women, captured in Dutch colonies in Asia, were also forced into sexual slavery.^[14][15]

According to Kono Statement in 1993, the origin of those comfort women who were transferred to the war areas, excluding those from Japan, those from the Korean Peninsula accounted for a large part.^[16]

According to Kanto Gakuin University professor Hirofumi Hayashi, the majority of the women were from Japan, Korea, and China.^[13]

To date, only one Japanese woman has published her testimony. This was done in 1971, when a former "comfort woman" forced to work for showa soldiers in Taiwan, published her memoirs under the pseudonym of Suzuko Shirota.^[17]

[edit] Establishment of the Comfort Women System

[edit] Japanese military prostitution

Given the well-organized and open nature of prostitution in Japan, it was seen as logical that there should be organized prostitution to serve the Japanese Armed Forces.^[18] Japanese authorities hoped that by providing easily accessible prostitutes, the morale and ultimately the military effectiveness of Japanese soldiers would be improved. Also, by institutionalizing brothels and placing them under official scrutiny, the government hoped to control the spread of STDs.

In spite of the analysis made by the author George Hicks mentioned in the preceding paragraph, military correspondence of Japanese Imperial Army shows that the aim of facilitating comfort stations was prevention of rape crimes committed by Japanese army personnel and thus preventing rise of hostility among people in occupied areas.^[9]

[edit] Recruitment

In the early stages of the war, Japanese authorities recruited prostitutes through conventional means. Middlemen advertised in newspapers circulating in Japan and the Japanese colonies of Korea, Taiwan, Manchukuo, and mainland China. However, these sources soon dried up, especially from Japan.^[19]

On April 17, 2007, Yoshiaki Yoshimi and Hirofumi Hayashi announced the discovery, in the archives of the Tokyo Trials, of seven official documents suggesting that Imperial military forces, such as the Tokeitai (naval secret police), directly coerced women to work in frontline brothels in China, Indochina and Indonesia. These documents were initially made public at the war crimes trial. In one of these, a lieutenant is quoted as confessing having organized a brothel and having used it himself. Another source refers to Tokeitai members having arrested women on the streets, and after enforced medical examinations, putting them in brothels.^[20]

On 12 May 2007, journalist Taichiro Kaijimura announced the discovery of 30 Netherland government documents submitted to the Tokyo tribunal as evidence of a forced massed prostitution incident in 1944 in Magelang.^[21]

In other cases, some victims from East Timor testified they were forced when they were not old enough to have started menstruating and repeatedly raped by Japanese soldiers.^[22]

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs resisted further issuance of travel visas for Japanese prostitutes, feeling it tarnished the image of the Japanese Empire.^[23] The military turned to acquiring comfort women outside mainland Japan, especially from Korea and occupied China. Many women were tricked or defrauded into joining the military brothels.^[24] The US Army Force Office report of interview with 20 comfort women in Burma found that the girls were induced by the offer of plenty of money, an opportunity to pay off the family debts, and on the basis of these false representations many girls enlisted for overseas duty and were rewarded with advance of a few hundred yen.^[25]

In urban areas, conventional advertising through middlemen was used alongside kidnapping. However, along the front lines, especially in the countryside where middlemen were rare, the military often directly demanded that local leaders procure women for the brothels. This situation became worse as the war progressed. Under the strain of the war effort, the military became unable to provide enough supplies to Japanese units; in response, the units made up the difference by demanding or looting supplies from the locals. Moreover, when the locals, especially Chinese, were considered hostile, Japanese soldiers carried out the "Three Alls Policy", which included indiscriminately kidnapping and raping local civilians.^[26][27][28]

[edit] Treatment of comfort women

According to Unit 731 soldier Yasuji Kaneko^[29] "The women cried out, but it didn't matter to us whether the women lived or died. We were the emperor's soldiers. Whether in military brothels or in the villages, we raped without reluctance."^[30] Beatings and physical torture were said to be not uncommon.^[31]

Ten Dutch women were taken by force from prison camps in Java by officers of the Japanese Imperial Army to become forced sex slaves in February 1944. They were systematically beaten and raped day and night in a so called "Comfort Station".^[31][6] As a victim of the incident, Jan Ruff-O'Hearn testified to a U.S. House of Representatives committee, "Many stories have been told about the horrors, brutalities, suffering and starvation of Dutch women in Japanese prison camps. But one story was never told, the most shameful story of the worst human rights abuse committed by the Japanese during World War II: The story of the “Comfort Women”, the jugun ianfu, and how these women were forcibly seized against their will, to provide sexual services for the Japanese Imperial Army. In the so-called “Comfort Station” I was systematically beaten and raped day and night. Even the Japanese doctor raped me each time he visited the brothel to examine us for veneral disease."^[31][6]

Although they were returned to the prison camps within three months upon protest of the Dutch prisoners against the Imperial Army, the Japanese officers were not punished by Japanese authorities until the end of the war.^[32] After the end of the war 11 Japanese officers were declared guilty with one sentenced to death by the Batavia War Criminal Court.^[32] It decided that the case was not crime organized by the Army and that the ones who raped violated the Army’s order to hire only voluntary women.^[32] Some researchers have found documents giving instructions not to treat comfort women violently.^[33]

Hank Nelson, emeritus professor at the Australian National University’s Asia Pacific Research Division has written about the brothels run by the Japanese military in Rabaul, Papua New Guinea during WWII. He quotes from the diary of Gordon Thomas, a POW in Rabaul. Thomas writes that the women working at the brothels “most likely served 25 to 35 men a day” and that they were “victims of the yellow slave trade.”^[34]

Nelson also quotes from Kentaro Igusa, a Japanese naval surgeon who was stationed in Rabaul. Igusa wrote in his memoirs that the women continued to work through infection and severe discomfort, though they “cried and begged for help.”^[34]

[edit] Evidence

After its defeat the Japanese military destroyed many documents for fear of war crimes prosecution.^[35] There is hard evidence proving official orders from the Japanese Ministry of War to destroy evidence.^[36] The testimony of Japanese Army officers that they kidnapped women is disputed.^{[citation needed]}

Historians have searched for evidence of the Army and Navy's coercion, and some written proof has been discovered, such as documents found in 2007 by Yoshiaki Yoshimi and Hirofumi Hayashi.^[37]

[edit] History of the controversy

[edit] Disputed testimony of an ex-soldier

In 1983, Seiji Yoshida published Watashino sensō hanzai - Chōsenjin Kyōsei Renkō (My War Crimes: The Impressment of Koreans), in which the author confesses to forcibly procuring women from Jeju Island in Korea under the direct order from the Japanese military. In 1991, Asahi Shimbun, one of the major newspapers of Japan, ran a series on comfort women for a year. This is often regarded as the trigger of the on-going controversy over comfort women in Japan. In this series the Asahi Shimbun repeatedly published excerpts of his book. Consequently, it was regarded as evidence of "forced comfort women" and cited in the U.N. report by Dr. Radhika Coomaraswamy.

But some people doubted Yoshida's "confession" because he was alone in admitting to such crimes. When Prof. Ikuhiko Hata revisited the villages in South Korea where Yoshida claimed he had abducted many women, nobody confirmed Yoshida's confession and the situation was contradictory to his confession. When Hata questioned Yoshida on this matter, the latter admitted that he had taken artistic licence in respect to the places mentioned.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] Initial government response and litigation

Initially the Japanese government denied any official connection to the wartime brothels; in June 1990, the Japanese government declared that all brothels were run by private contractors.

In 1990, the Korean Council for Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery filed suit, demanding compensation. Several surviving comfort women also independently filed suit in the Tokyo District Court. The court rejected these claims on grounds such as statute of limitations, the immunity of the State at the time of the act concerned, and non-subjectivity of the individual of international law.^[38]

[edit] Kono statement

However, in 1991, the historian Yoshiaki Yoshimi discovered incriminating documents in the archives of Japan's Defense Agency. According to Yoshimi they indicated that the military was directly involved in running the brothels, for example by selecting the agents who recruited.^[39] The Asahi Shimbun, a major Japanese national daily, published these findings as a front-page article "Japanese Army abducted comfort women" on 11 January 1992. This caused a sensation and forced the government, represented by Chief Cabinet Secretary, Koichi Kato, to acknowledge some of the facts the same day. On January 17 1992, Prime minister Kiichi Miyazawa presented formal apologies for the suffering of the victims during a trip to South Korea.

After some government studies into the matter, Yohei Kono, the Chief Cabinet Secretary of the Japanese government, issued a statement on 4 August 1993. By this statement the Japanese government recognized that "Comfort stations were operated in response to the request of the military of the day", that "The Japanese military was directly or indirectly involved in the establishment and management of the comfort stations and the transfer of the women", "The recruitment of the comfort women was conducted mainly by private recruiters who acted in response to the request of the military. The Government study has revealed that in many cases they were recruited against their own will through coaxing and coercion". The government of Japan "sincerely apologize[d] and [expressed its] remorse to all those, irrespective of place of origin, who suffered immeasurable pain and incurable psychological wounds". In the statement, the government of Japan expressed its "firm determination never to repeat the same mistake and that they would engrave such issue through the study and teaching of history".^[16]

[edit] Asia Women's Fund

In 1995, Japan set up an "Asia Women's Fund" for atonement in the form of material compensation and to provide each surviving comfort woman with a signed apology from the then prime minister Junichiro Koizumi, stating "As Prime Minister of Japan, I thus extend anew my most sincere apologies and remorse to all the women who underwent immeasurable and painful experiences and suffered incurable physical and psychological wounds as comfort women."^[40] The fund is funded by private donations and not government money, and has been criticized as a way to avoid admitting government abuse.^[41][30] But because of the unofficial nature of the fund, many comfort women have rejected these payments and continue to seek an official apology and compensation.^[42]

[edit] United Nations Human Rights Commission

On June 22 1998, Gay J. McDougall, Special Rapporteur to the United Nations Human Rights Commission, released Contemporary Forms of Slavery^[43], a report based on prior UN investigation by Linda Chavez documenting systematic rape, sexual slavery and slavery-like practices in wartime in general but which was mainly aimed at bringing wider attention to the deep harm to human rights caused by Japan's comfort women program during World War II. The report detailed the official Japanese government stance as well as the UN's own legal position. MacDougall was awarded a MacArthur Fellows Program "genius" grant the year after her analysis.

[edit] Guilt and liability

The 1998 UN report listed their findings regarding Japan's guilt and liability:

• The system of comfort women used by the Japanese government during WWII falls under the international definition of slavery at the time, and slavery (sexual or otherwise) was illegal at the time. The 1926 Slavery Convention embodies one such definition. International prohibition of slavery was included in the Tokyo Charter which was used to make the International Military Tribunal for the Far East.^[43]
• Rape (including forced or coerced prostitution) was a war crime at the time; regardless of whether prostitution was widespread during WWII.^[43]
• Enslavement and other inhumane acts committed by the Japanese government can be considered “crimes against humanity.” In crimes against humanity, the nationality of the victim is irrelevant thus, (it doesn’t matter if the Japanese government was committing crimes against its enemies’ citizens or its own) it is liable for these offenses.^[43]
• The Japanese government is liable for crimes against humanity because of the considerable scale on which these crimes were committed.^[43]
• Arguments that the enslaving and raping of comfort women was perfectly legal at the time is similar to an argument that was used and refuted at the Nuremberg Trials.^[43]

[edit] Official position of the Japanese government

The 1998 UN report stated their understanding of Japan's legal position regarding compensation:

"Until the early 1990s, the Japanese government denied the extent of its involvement in the creation of comfort stations and the abuses committed against women (comfort women). The Japanese government has made various apologies since the early 1990s. One very notable apology was made by Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama in July of 1995 in which he specifically mentions the Japanese military’s involvement in crimes against comfort women. Though it has seemingly apologized repeatedly for these offenses, the Japanese government denies legal liability for the creation and maintenance of the system of “comfort stations” and comfort women used during WWII. The Japanese government has set up an Asia Women’s Fund which conveys Japan’s apologies for crimes committed against women during WWII through direct donations from the Japanese public. Despite this, according to the Japanese government, individual comfort women don’t deserve compensation."^[43]

[edit] Abe controversy

On 2 March 2007, the issue was raised again by Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, when he denied that the Japanese military had forced women into sexual slavery during World War II in an orchestrated way. He stated, "The fact is, there is no evidence to prove there was coercion." Before he spoke, a group of Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers also sought to revise Yohei Kono's 1993 apology to former comfort women.^{[dead link] [44][41]} Abe's statement provoked a negative reaction from Asian and Western countries. The New York Times editorial said, "These were not commercial brothels. Force, explicit and implicit, was used in recruiting these women."^[45] On 26 March 2007 Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe expressed his regrets for the violations of human rights with regard to comfort women.^{[citation needed]} According to Kyodo news, Abe's step back and announcement that he should stand after all to Yohei Kono's 1993 statement was made after firm warning by U.S. ambassador Thomas Schieffer.^[46]

[edit] U.S. Congressional resolution

In 2007, Mike Honda of the United States House of Representatives proposed House Resolution 121 which stated that Japan should formally acknowledge, apologize, and accept historical responsibility in a clear and unequivocal manner, refute any claims that the issue of comfort women never occurred, and educate current and future generations "about this horrible crime while following the recommendations of the international community with respect to the 'comfort women'."^[47] Honda has stated that "the purpose of this resolution is not to bash or humiliate Japan."^[48] However, the Japanese embassy in the U.S. stated that the Resolution was erroneous in terms of the facts and that it would be harmful to the friendship between the US and Japan.^[49]

On July 30, 2007, the resolution passed through the House of Representatives after half an hour of debate in which there was no opposition voiced.^[50] Honda was quoted on the floor as saying, "We must teach future generations that we cannot allow this to continue to happen. I have always believed that reconciliation is the first step in the healing process."^[50]

[edit] Dutch Parliament resolution

The lower house of the Dutch parliament passed a motion unanimously on November 20,2007, urging Japan to financially compensate the women forced into sex slavery during World War II.

"This should send a strong and clear signal to the Japanese government and the Japanese people, that so many years after World War II, people in the Netherlands still want the Japanese to recognize the war crimes of the past and to recognize the victims," said van Baalen, who tabled the motion. "It is a matter still taken seriously in the Netherlands," he said. ^{[51] [52]}

[edit] Canadian Lower House resolution

Canada's lower house unanimously approved a draft motion on November 28, 2007 that urges the Japanese government to make a "formal and sincere apology" to women who were forced by the Japanese military to provide sex for soldiers during World War II.

The text of the motion said the Canadian government should call on the Japanese government "to take full responsibility for the involvement of the Japanese Imperial Forces in the system of forced prostitution, including through a formal and sincere apology expressed in the Diet to all of those who were victims; and to continue to address with those affected in a spirit of reconciliation."

It also said, "Some Japanese public officials have recently expressed a regrettable desire to dilute or rescind the 1993 statement by Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono on the 'comfort women,' which expressed the (Japanese) Government's sincere apologies and remorse for their ordeal."

The motion, though nonbinding, also said the Canadian government should call on Japan to abandon any statement which devalues the expression of regret from the Kono statement and to clearly and publicly refute any claims that the sexual enslavement and trafficking of the "comfort women" for the Imperial Japanese Army never occurred.^[53][54]

[edit] European Parliament resolution

Following a campaign by Amnesty International to press the EU on making a statement about the issue, on 13 December 2007 the European Parliament in Strasbourg passed a resolution calling for the Japanese government to formally acknowledge its historical responsibility over the Comfort Women issue, as well as apologize and compensate victims.

The motion was submitted by Jean Lambert, a Green member of the European Parliament, and was voted through by 54 Member of the European Parliament's. The resolution, while acknowledging past statements by the Japanese government, noted that "some Japanese officials have recently expressed a regrettable desire to dilute or rescind those statements" and called for the Japanese government to "formally acknowledge, apologize and accept historical and legal responsibility, in a clear and unequivocal manner". The resolution also called for the Japanese government to remove legal obstacles to compensation for the victims, and to take steps to educate people about these events. ^{[55] [56][57][58]}

[edit] Counter theories

Image:Emblem-important.svg

The factual accuracy of this section is disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page

The main opposition to the mainstream ideas about comfort women is perhaps the view held by Ikuhiko Hata and other revisionist historians. They question the credibility of certain evidence used to prove the existence and scope of various warcrimes committed by Japan including the abuse of comfort women. These Japanese historians argue that there is no evidence to prove the Japanese military's direct involvement in coercion of the women. In their view, there was violent treatment of comfort women by private agents, which would make the Japanese Military only responsible for insufficient supervision.^{[citation needed]}

Hata estimates the number of comfort women to be more likely between 10,000 and 20,000 (in contrast to 60,000 to 300,000 estimated by other historians).^[9] Hata writes that none of the comfort women were forcibly recruited.^[59] He writes that in the 1930s, there were 200,000 prostitutes in mainland Japan where there were more than 30 million customers, while the number of soldiers was only 3 million in the entire Pacific front.^{[citation needed]}

The proportion of countries of origin of the women is also in dispute. Though the precise number of comfort women is still under debate, Hata's study concludes that 40% of them were from Japan, 20% from Korea, 10% from China, and others making up the remaining 30%.^{[citation needed]}

One argument revisionists use^{[attribution needed]} to oppose the mainstream conclusions about the abuse of comfort women is to question the credibility of testimony given by former comfort women. Some Japanese politicians have argued that the former comfort womens' testimony is inconsistent and unreliable; making it invalid.^[60] For example, some self-identified victims^{[attribution needed]} state that they were kidnapped by somebody like a soldier, but they didn't know who they were.^{[citation needed]}

Some groups in Japan have protested the mainstream ideas about comfort women being broadcast in mass media. This resulted in the NHK controversy in early 2001. What was supposed to be coverage of the Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery was extremely edited and an interview with Hata was inserted at the last minute to appease the right-wing groups that complained to NHK.^[61]

[edit] See also

• Japanese war crimes
• List of War Apology Statements Issued by Japan
• Anti-Japanese sentiment
• Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea
• Trafficking in human beings
• Joy Division (World War II)
• Recreation and Amusement Association
• Historical revisionism (negationism)
• United States House of Representatives House Resolution 121
• Rosa Henson, a Filipina who told her story as a comfort woman.

[edit] References

[edit] Footnotes

[edit] Print media

Some recent work on the comfort women issue include:

• Barbara Drinck, Chung-noh Gross Forced Prostitution in Times of War and Peace, Kleine Verlag, 2007. ISBN-13: 978-3-89370-436-1.
• Tanaka, Yuki Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During World War II and the US Occupation, London, Routledge: 2002. ISBN 0-415-19401-6.
• Yoshimi, Yoshiaki Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military During World War II, Columbia University Press, 2001. (mentioned RAA too) ISBN 0-231-12032-X.
• Molasky, Michael S. American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa, Routledge, 1999. ISBN 0-415-19194-7, ISBN 0-415-26044-2.
• D. Kim-Gibson, Silence Broken: Korean Comfort Women, 1999. ISBN 0-931209-88-9.
• Hicks, George L. The Comfort Women: Japan's Brutal Regime of Enforced Prostitution in the Second World War, 1997. ISBN 0-393-31694-7.
• Schellstede, Sangmie Choi. Comfort Women Speak: Testimony by Sex Slaves of the Japanese Military, 2000. ISBN 0-8419-1413-3.

A review of the Tanaka text can be found in the academic journal Intersections, Issue 9:

• Morris, Narrelle. Review of Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During World War II and the US Occupation. [5]

A review of some of these books and a history and historiography of the issue, from a critical viewpoint, can be found in issue 58:2 of Monumenta Nipponica:

• Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashii "Comfort Women: Beyond Litigious Feminism"

A work of literature on the issue was created by Korean American writer Nora Okja Keller:

• Nora Okja Keller "Comfort Woman", London, Penguin: 1998. ISBN 0-14-026335-7.

A Filipina woman writes of her experiences as a comfort woman for Japanese troops

• Maria Rosa Henson "Comfort woman: Slave of destiny", Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism: 1996. ISBN 9718686118.

[edit] Web

Find more information on Comfort women by searching Wikipedia's sister projects
Image:Wiktionary-logo-en.png	Dictionary definitions from Wiktionary
Image:Wikibooks-logo.svg	Textbooks from Wikibooks
Image:Wikiquote-logo.svg	Quotations from Wikiquote
Image:Wikisource-logo.svg	Source texts from Wikisource
Image:Commons-logo.svg	Images and media from Commons
Image:Wikinews-logo.svg	News stories from Wikinews
Image:Wikiversity-logo-Snorky.svg	Learning resources from Wikiversity

• Asian Women's Fund web site
• Comfort-Women.org
• Korea Dutch Indies Sex Slavery Translation Project
• www.Support121.org 121 Coalition
• "The Victims" (from the South Korean Ministry of Gender and Family Equality)
• Photo gallery at the Seoul Times.
• A Public Betrayed - How the Japanese Media Betrays its Own People
• Coop, Stephanie (December 23, 2006). Sex slave exhibition exposes darkness in East Timor (Newspaper article). The Japan Times. Retrieved on 2006-12-23.
• Nakamura, Akemi; Ikuhiko Hata (denies that sex slavery existed) & Yoshiaki Yoshimi (vocally supports the position that sexual slavery occurred) (March 20, 2007). Comfort Women: Were they teen-rape slaves or paid pros?. The Japan Times. Retrieved on 2006-03-23.

[edit] Academic research

• The Comfort Women project
• Hayashi Hirofumi's papers on comfort women
• Responsibility Toward Comfort Women Survivors: Japan Policy Research Institute Working Paper 77.
• Japan's Comfort Women, Theirs and Ours: Book review, Japan Policy Research Institute Critique 9:2.
• Journal of Asian American Studies 6:1, Feb 2003, issue on American studies of comfort women, Kandice Chuh, ed.
• No Organized or Forced Recruitment: Misconceptions about Comfort Women and the Japanese Military :Critical study on comfort women problem.

[edit] Japanese official statements

• Statement by Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama on the occasion of the establishment of the "Asian Women's Fund" (1995, Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
• Letter from Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to the former comfort women (2001, Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

[edit] United States historical documents

• House Concurrent Resolution 226 (June 23, 2003, 108th United States Congress), introduced by Rep. Lane Evans (Illinois 17), referred to House Committee on International Relations; not passed.
• Japanese Comfort Women (1944, United States Office of War Information)

v • d • e World War II
Western Europe · Eastern Europe · Africa · Mediterranean · Asia and the Pacific · Atlantic
Major participants			Timeline		Aspects
To 1945 unless otherwise indicated. Principal co-belligerents in italics.			Prelude • Causes • in Asia • in Europe 1937 • Invasion of China 1939 • Invasion of Poland • Phoney War • Winter War • Battle of the Atlantic5 1940 • Denmark and Norway • Battle of France • Battle of Britain • Libya and Egypt • British Somaliland • Occupation of Baltic states • Bessarabia and Bukovina • Invasion of Indochina • Invasion of Greece 1941 • East Africa • Invasion of Yugoslavia • Invasion of the USSR • Middle East • Siege of Leningrad • Attack on Pearl Harbor 1942 • Battle of Midway • Battle of Stalingrad • 2nd Battle of El Alamein • Operation Torch • Guadalcanal campaign	1943 • End in Africa • Battle of Kursk • Solomon Islands campaign • Invasion of Sicily • Invasion of Italy5 1944 • Cassino and Anzio • Battle of Normandy • Belorussia and Ukraine • Warsaw Uprising • Iassy-Kishinev Operation • Liberation of Paris • Operation Market Garden • Battle of Leyte Gulf 1945 • Battle of Okinawa • Battle of Berlin • Germany surrenders • Hiroshima and Nagasaki • Japan surrenders • misc. military engagements Aftermath and Consequences • Effects • Casualties • Expulsion of Germans • Occupation of Germany • Morgenthau plan • Territorial changes • Occupation of Japan • Franco-Vietnamese War • Cold War • in contemporary culture • Possible World War III	• Attacks on North America • Blitzkrieg • Comparative military ranks • Cryptography • Home front • Military awards • Military equipment • Military production • Resistance • Technology • Total war Civilian impact and atrocities • Allied war crimes • German war crimes • Italian war crimes • Japanese war crimes • Soviet war crimes • The Holocaust • Bombing of civilians
Allies		Axis
at war from 1937 Image:Flag of the Republic of China.svg China entered 1939 Image:Flag of Poland.svg Poland Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg UK Image:British Raj Red Ensign.svg India Image:Flag of France.svg France Image:Flag of Australia.svg Australia Image:Flag of New Zealand.svg New Zealand Image:Flag of South Africa 1928-1994.svg South Africa Image:Canadian Red Ensign 1921.svg Canada entered 1940 Image:Flag of Norway.svg Norway Image:Flag of Belgium (civil).svg Belgium Image:Flag of the Netherlands.svg Netherlands Image:State Flag of the Kingdom of Greece.svg Greece	entered 1941 Image:Flag of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (civil).svg Yugoslavia Image:Flag of the Soviet Union 1923.svg USSR Image:US flag 48 stars.svg USA Image:Flag of Czechoslovakia.svg Czechoslovakia entered 1942 Image:Flag of Brazil (1889-1960).svg Brazil entered 1943 Image:Flag of Italy (1861-1946).svg Italy entered 1944 Image:Rumania.gif Romania Image:Flag of Bulgaria (1878-1944).svg Bulgaria Image:Flag of Finland.svg Finland • others	at war from 1937 Image:Flag of Japan - variant.svg Japan entered 1939 Image:Flag of Germany 1933.svg Germany Image:Flag of the Soviet Union 1923.svg USSR  (to 1941) Image:Flag of First Slovak Republic 1939-1945.svg Slovakia entered 1940 Image:Flag of Italy (1861-1946).svg Italy  (to 1943) entered 1941 Image:Flag of Bulgaria (1878-1944).svg Bulgaria  (to 1944) Image:Flag of Croatia Ustasa.svg Croatia Image:Flag of Hungary 1940.svg Hungary Image:Rumania.gif Romania  (to 1944) Image:Flag of Finland.svg Finland  (to 1944) entered 1942 Image:Flag of Thailand.svg Thailand entered 1943 Image:Flag of Italy.svg RSI • others
• Allied Leaders • Axis Leaders • Commanders
Resistance movements Austria · Baltic2 · Bessarabia1 · Czechia · Denmark · Ethiopia · France · Germany · Greece · Italy · Jewish · Korea · Netherlands · Moldavia1 · Norway · Poland · Thailand · USSR · Slovakia4 · Ukraine3 · Vietnam · Yugoslavia · others
			Lists
			Category · Topics · Conferences
1 Anti-Soviet. 2 Anti-Soviet and anti-Nazi. 3 Anti-Nazi, anti-Polish, and anti-Soviet. 4 Anti-Magyar, anti-Nazi, and anti-Soviet. 5 Lasted to May 1945.		Image:Wiktionary-logo-en.png World War II at Wiktionary Image:Wikibooks-logo.svg WWII textbooks at Wikibooks     Image:Wikiquote-logo.svg WWII quotes at Wikiquote Image:Wikisource-logo.svg WWII source texts at Wikisource      Image:Commons-logo.svg WWII media at Commons Image:Wikinews-logo.svg WWII news stories at Wikinews

ar:نساء المتعة (اليابان)

de:Trostfrauen eo:Komfortulinoj fr:Femmes de réconfort ko:위안부 io:Mulieri di komforto id:Jugun ianfu nl:Troostmeisje ja:慰安婦 pl:Kobiety do towarzystwa ro:Femei de reconfortare simple:Comfort women th:อิอันฟุ tr:Rahatlatıcı Kadınlar zh:慰安妇